CATH vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCATHVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.29%0.04%
AUM$1.3B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.77%2.86%
Holdings448568
YTD Return+8.31%+13.24%
1Y Return+16.31%+23.76%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.70%+16.97%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.44%+12.26%
Volatility (annualized)15.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-34.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 18, 2016Nov 10, 2006

CATH vs VYM Performance

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CATH returned +16.31% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, CATH is up 8.31% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.

Over three years, CATH compounded at +17.70% per year against +16.97% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.44% and +12.26% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +13.65% annualized vs +6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CATH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CATH charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.77% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

30.8%overlap

CATH and VYM share 191 holdings out of 782 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CATHWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO0.02%6.47%6.45%
CSCO4.53%1.39%3.14%
PG3.27%1.72%1.55%
GILDProProPro
BACProProPro
JPMProProPro
HDProProPro
XOMProProPro
WMTProProPro
CVXProProPro
See all 10 holdings CATH shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CATH or VYM?

CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CATH or VYM?

Over the past year CATH returned +16.31% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +13.65% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CATH or VYM?

CATH has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both CATH and VYM?

CATH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CATH and VYM?

CATH and VYM share 191 common holdings with a 30.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 782 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or VYM?

CATH yields 0.77% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →