CATH vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. CATH offers more diversification with 415 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: CATH

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCATHQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.29%0.18%
AUM$1.3B$455.8B
Dividend Yield0.77%0.41%
Holdings448108
YTD Return+12.09%+18.34%
1Y Return+20.49%+28.94%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.77%+25.28%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.16%+15.22%
Volatility (annualized)15.6%30.6%
Max Drawdown-34.0%-83.0%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 18, 2016Mar 10, 1999

CATH vs QQQ Performance

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CATH returned +20.49% while QQQ returned +28.94%. Year to date, CATH is up 12.09% versus a gain of 18.34% for QQQ.

Over three years, CATH compounded at +19.77% per year against +25.28% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.16% and +15.22% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +14.01% annualized vs +13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.6% for CATH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CATH charges 0.29% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.77% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

20.8%overlap

CATH and QQQ share 79 holdings out of 439 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CATHWeight in QQQDifference
LRCX7.81%1.82%5.99%
NVDA0.02%7.88%7.86%
AAPL0.02%7.46%7.44%
CSCOProProPro
MUProProPro
MSFTProProPro
GILDProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
ISRGProProPro
See all 10 holdings CATH shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CATH or QQQ?

CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CATH or QQQ?

Over the past year CATH returned +20.49% vs +28.94% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +14.01% vs +13.12% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CATH or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.6% for CATH. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both CATH and QQQ?

CATH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between CATH and QQQ?

CATH and QQQ share 79 common holdings with a 20.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 439 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or QQQ?

CATH yields 0.77% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CATH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →