CATH vs IVV
CATH vs IVV
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CATH | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 448 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.09% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.49% | +23.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.77% | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.16% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
CATH vs IVV Performance
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CATH returned +20.49% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, CATH is up 12.09% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.
Over three years, CATH compounded at +19.77% per year against +21.26% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.16% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +14.01% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CATH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CATH charges 0.29% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.77% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CATH and IVV share 409 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CATH | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 0.02% | 7.76% | 7.74% |
| AAPL | 0.02% | 7.44% | 7.42% |
| GE | 6.84% | 0.55% | 6.29% |
| CSCO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GILD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings CATH shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CATH or IVV?
CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CATH or IVV?
Over the past year CATH returned +20.49% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +14.01% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CATH or IVV?
CATH has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CATH and IVV?
CATH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CATH and IVV?
CATH and IVV share 409 common holdings with a 38.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or IVV?
CATH yields 0.77% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.