AGGS vs VTI
AGGS vs VTI
Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGGS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $39M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 276 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.10% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.77% | +24.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AGGS vs VTI Performance
Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF (AGGS) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGGS returned +2.77% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, AGGS is up 0.10% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 4.2% for AGGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.6% for AGGS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGGS charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGGS currently yields 5.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AGGS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2928 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGGS or VTI?
AGGS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGGS or VTI?
Over the past year AGGS returned +2.77% vs +24.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AGGS annualized +5.13% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGGS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 4.2% for AGGS. Worst drawdown: AGGS -4.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGGS and VTI?
AGGS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGGS and VTI?
AGGS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2928 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGGS or VTI?
AGGS yields 5.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AGGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.