VTI vs YNOT

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. YNOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: YNOTMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIYNOTWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.75%
AUM$663.5B$130M
Dividend Yield1.07%0.00%
Holdings3,543105
YTD Return+13.92%+15.41%
1Y Return+24.07%+25.81%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.88%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.47%-
Volatility (annualized)15.3%24.9%
Max Drawdown-56.6%-17.3%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Horizon Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 24, 2001Jul 9, 2025

VTI vs YNOT Performance

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) is a ETF from Horizon Funds. Over the past year VTI returned +24.07% while YNOT returned +25.81%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.92% versus a gain of 15.41% for YNOT.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

YNOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -17.3% for YNOT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while YNOT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for YNOT.

Holdings Overlap

31.6%overlap

VTI and YNOT share 63 holdings out of 2822 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VTIWeight in YNOTDifference
NVDA6.32%8.15%1.83%
MSFT3.81%5.51%1.70%
GOOG2.27%6.93%4.66%
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
MUProProPro
CATProProPro
PLTRProProPro
AMDProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings VTI shares with YNOT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or YNOT?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YNOT charges 0.75%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VTI or YNOT?

Over the past year VTI returned +24.07% vs +25.81% for YNOT, so YNOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VTI annualized +8.13% vs +28.66% for YNOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VTI or YNOT?

YNOT has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs YNOT -17.3%.

Should I hold both VTI and YNOT?

VTI and YNOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between VTI and YNOT?

VTI and YNOT share 63 common holdings with a 31.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2822 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YNOT?

VTI yields 1.07% while YNOT yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →