UYM vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: UYMMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUYMVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%
AUM$39M$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.16%1.07%
Holdings323,543
YTD Return+22.97%+13.39%
1Y Return+34.11%+23.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+8.85%+20.65%
5Y Return (annualized)+5.84%+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)45.6%15.3%
Max Drawdown-92.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJan 30, 2007May 24, 2001

UYM vs VTI Performance

ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UYM returned +34.11% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, UYM is up 22.97% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.

Over three years, UYM compounded at +8.85% per year against +20.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.84% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.8% for UYM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UYM charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UYM currently yields 1.16% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

1.5%overlap

UYM and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in UYMWeight in VTIDifference
LIN:IE10.15%0.33%9.82%
NEM4.26%0.14%4.12%
FCX3.56%0.12%3.44%
CTVAProProPro
SHWProProPro
APDProProPro
ECLProProPro
VMCProProPro
MLMProProPro
CRH:IEProProPro
See all 10 holdings UYM shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UYM or VTI?

UYM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, UYM or VTI?

Over the past year UYM returned +34.11% vs +23.21% for VTI, so UYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), UYM annualized +2.98% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, UYM or VTI?

UYM has been the more volatile fund at 45.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UYM -92.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both UYM and VTI?

UYM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between UYM and VTI?

UYM and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, UYM or VTI?

UYM yields 1.16% while VTI yields 1.07%, so UYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →