UYM vs VXUS
UYM vs VXUS
ProShares Ultra Materials vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. UYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UYM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $39M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.16% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +25.71% | +13.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.23% | +28.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.66% | +18.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.94% | +9.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 45.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UYM vs VXUS Performance
ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UYM returned +34.23% while VXUS returned +28.53%. Year to date, UYM is up 25.71% versus a gain of 13.65% for VXUS.
Over three years, UYM compounded at +9.66% per year against +18.64% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.94% and +9.00% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.81% annualized vs +3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.8% for UYM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UYM charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UYM currently yields 1.16% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
UYM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7886 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UYM or VXUS?
UYM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UYM or VXUS?
Over the past year UYM returned +34.23% vs +28.53% for VXUS, so UYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), UYM annualized +3.10% vs +4.81% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UYM or VXUS?
UYM has been the more volatile fund at 45.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: UYM -92.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UYM and VXUS?
UYM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UYM and VXUS?
UYM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7886 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UYM or VXUS?
UYM yields 1.16% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.