UMDD vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UMDD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: UMDDMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUMDDVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%
AUM$33M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.63%1.07%
Holdings4093,543
YTD Return+39.90%+13.57%
1Y Return+60.18%+24.23%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.66%+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.04%+12.24%
Volatility (annualized)52.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-86.4%-56.6%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionFeb 9, 2010May 24, 2001

UMDD vs VTI Performance

UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UMDD returned +60.18% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, UMDD is up 39.90% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.

Over three years, UMDD compounded at +19.66% per year against +20.73% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.04% and +12.24% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, UMDD has the edge at +19.26% annualized vs +8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UMDD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.4% for UMDD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UMDD charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UMDD currently yields 0.63% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

2.6%overlap

UMDD and VTI share 291 holdings out of 2892 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in UMDDWeight in VTIDifference
TWLO0.48%0.04%0.44%
CRS0.46%0.04%0.42%
CW0.44%0.04%0.40%
ILMNProProPro
0RMV:LNProProPro
ATIProProPro
WWDProProPro
MKSIProProPro
OKTAProProPro
XPOProProPro
See all 10 holdings UMDD shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UMDD or VTI?

UMDD has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, UMDD or VTI?

Over the past year UMDD returned +60.18% vs +24.23% for VTI, so UMDD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), UMDD annualized +19.26% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, UMDD or VTI?

UMDD has been the more volatile fund at 52.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UMDD -86.4% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both UMDD and VTI?

UMDD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between UMDD and VTI?

UMDD and VTI share 291 common holdings with a 2.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2892 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, UMDD or VTI?

UMDD yields 0.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →