UITB vs VXUS
UITB vs VXUS
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UITB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.17% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 1,143 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.45% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.66% | +27.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.28% | +17.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.01% | +8.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UITB vs VXUS Performance
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UITB returned +2.66% while VXUS returned +27.13%. Year to date, UITB is down 0.45% versus a gain of 11.13% for VXUS.
Over three years, UITB compounded at +4.28% per year against +17.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.01% and +8.71% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.66% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.5% for UITB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.0% for UITB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UITB charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UITB currently yields 4.17% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
UITB and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8876 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UITB or VXUS?
UITB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UITB or VXUS?
Over the past year UITB returned +2.66% vs +27.13% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), UITB annualized +1.09% vs +4.66% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UITB or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.5% for UITB. Worst drawdown: UITB -17.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UITB and VXUS?
UITB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UITB and VXUS?
UITB and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8876 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UITB or VXUS?
UITB yields 4.17% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so UITB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.