UITB vs VOO
UITB vs VOO
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. UITB offers more diversification with 1016 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UITB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.17% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,143 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.08% | +13.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.23% | +23.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.52% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.11% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
UITB vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UITB returned +2.23% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, UITB is up 0.08% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.
Over three years, UITB compounded at +4.52% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.11% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 5.5% for UITB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.0% for UITB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UITB charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UITB currently yields 4.17% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
UITB and VOO share 1 holdings out of 1520 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in UITB | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UITB or VOO?
UITB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UITB or VOO?
Over the past year UITB returned +2.23% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), UITB annualized +1.15% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UITB or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 5.5% for UITB. Worst drawdown: UITB -17.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UITB and VOO?
UITB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UITB and VOO?
UITB and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UITB or VOO?
UITB yields 4.17% while VOO yields 1.09%, so UITB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.