TURF vs VTI
TURF vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TURF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TURF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 347 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.11% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.53% | +24.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
TURF vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TURF returned +31.53% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, TURF is up 12.11% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TURF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for TURF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TURF charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
TURF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2945 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TURF or VTI?
TURF has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TURF or VTI?
Over the past year TURF returned +31.53% vs +24.23% for VTI, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TURF annualized +28.34% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TURF or VTI?
TURF has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TURF -13.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TURF and VTI?
TURF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TURF and VTI?
TURF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2945 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.