QQQ vs TURF
QQQ vs TURF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TURF delivered stronger 1-year returns. TURF offers more diversification with 162 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TURF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | - | |
| Holdings | 108 | 347 | |
| YTD Return | +18.20% | +13.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.63% | +33.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.54% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 17.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -13.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | T.Rowe Price | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 11, 2025 |
QQQ vs TURF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% while TURF returned +33.10%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.20% versus a gain of 13.37% for TURF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.9% for TURF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -13.2% for TURF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TURF charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $44 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TURF share 0 holdings out of 265 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TURF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TURF charges 0.44%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TURF?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% vs +33.10% for TURF, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +13.11% vs +29.43% for TURF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TURF?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.9% for TURF. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TURF -13.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TURF?
QQQ and TURF have a monthly-return correlation of -0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TURF?
QQQ and TURF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 265 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.