TURF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. TURF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: TURFMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTURFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.44%0.04%
AUM-$79.0B
Dividend Yield-2.86%
Holdings347568
YTD Return+12.11%+15.45%
1Y Return+31.53%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)17.9%14.6%
Max Drawdown-13.2%-58.8%
Fund FamilyT.Rowe PriceVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 11, 2025Nov 10, 2006

TURF vs VYM Performance

T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TURF returned +31.53% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, TURF is up 12.11% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TURF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for TURF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TURF charges 0.44% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $4 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

TURF and VYM share 0 holdings out of 720 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TURF or VYM?

TURF has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.

Which performed better, TURF or VYM?

Over the past year TURF returned +31.53% vs +26.05% for VYM, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TURF annualized +28.34% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, TURF or VYM?

TURF has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TURF -13.2% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both TURF and VYM?

TURF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between TURF and VYM?

TURF and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 720 unique securities.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →