RSMV vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRSMVVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%
AUM$23M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.91%1.07%
Holdings313,543
YTD Return+5.92%+13.92%
1Y Return+16.91%+24.07%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.88%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.47%
Volatility (annualized)11.8%15.3%
Max Drawdown-17.6%-56.6%
Fund FamilyTeucriumVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 13, 2025May 24, 2001

RSMV vs VTI Performance

Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSMV returned +16.91% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, RSMV is up 5.92% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.8% for RSMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for RSMV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RSMV charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMV currently yields 0.91% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

27.9%overlap

RSMV and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RSMVWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA2.01%6.32%4.31%
AAPL2.10%5.84%3.74%
GOOGL1.97%2.88%0.91%
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
LLYProProPro
AMDProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
TSLAProProPro
JPMProProPro
See all 10 holdings RSMV shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RSMV or VTI?

RSMV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RSMV or VTI?

Over the past year RSMV returned +16.91% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMV annualized +11.21% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RSMV or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.8% for RSMV. Worst drawdown: RSMV -17.6% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RSMV and VTI?

RSMV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RSMV and VTI?

RSMV and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 27.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RSMV or VTI?

RSMV yields 0.91% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →