RSMV vs VXUS
RSMV vs VXUS
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSMV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $23M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.96% | +11.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.75% | +26.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RSMV vs VXUS Performance
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSMV returned +14.75% while VXUS returned +26.65%. Year to date, RSMV is up 3.96% versus a gain of 11.69% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 11.7% for RSMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for RSMV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSMV charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMV currently yields 0.91% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RSMV and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7894 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSMV | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:AS | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSMV or VXUS?
RSMV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSMV or VXUS?
Over the past year RSMV returned +14.75% vs +26.65% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMV annualized +9.90% vs +4.69% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSMV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 11.7% for RSMV. Worst drawdown: RSMV -17.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RSMV and VXUS?
RSMV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSMV and VXUS?
RSMV and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSMV or VXUS?
RSMV yields 0.91% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.