RQI vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRQIVTIWinner
Expense Ratio1.91%0.03%
AUM$1,620.47$663.5B
Dividend Yield8.59%1.07%
Holdings2003,543
YTD Return+14.80%+14.20%
1Y Return+11.71%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.30%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+3.16%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)33.2%15.3%
Max Drawdown-94.1%-56.6%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 28, 2002May 24, 2001

RQI vs VTI Performance

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc (RQI) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RQI returned +11.71% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, RQI is up 14.80% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, RQI compounded at +11.30% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.16% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 24-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for RQI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RQI charges 1.91% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $191 vs $3 annually, a gap of $188 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RQI currently yields 8.59% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

1.7%overlap

RQI and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2925 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RQIWeight in VTIDifference
WELL17.16%0.22%16.94%
DLR10.71%0.09%10.62%
AMT8.41%0.10%8.31%
CCIProProPro
PLDProProPro
EQIXProProPro
EXRProProPro
KIMProProPro
IRMProProPro
ELSProProPro
See all 10 holdings RQI shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RQI or VTI?

RQI has an expense ratio of 1.91% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $188 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RQI or VTI?

Over the past year RQI returned +11.71% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (24 years), RQI annualized +1.09% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RQI or VTI?

RQI has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RQI -94.1% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RQI and VTI?

RQI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RQI and VTI?

RQI and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2925 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RQI or VTI?

RQI yields 8.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →