RQI vs VXUS
RQI vs VXUS
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RQI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.91% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1,620.47 | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.59% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 200 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.80% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.71% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.30% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.16% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2002 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RQI vs VXUS Performance
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc (RQI) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RQI returned +11.71% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RQI is up 14.80% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, RQI compounded at +11.30% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.16% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for RQI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RQI charges 1.91% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $191 vs $5 annually, a gap of $186 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RQI currently yields 8.59% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RQI or VXUS?
RQI has an expense ratio of 1.91% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $186 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RQI or VXUS?
Over the past year RQI returned +11.71% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RQI annualized +1.09% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RQI or VXUS?
RQI has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RQI -94.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RQI and VXUS?
RQI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RQI and VXUS?
RQI and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8030 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RQI or VXUS?
RQI yields 8.59% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.