RQI vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRQIVOOWinner
Expense Ratio1.91%0.03%
AUM$1,620.47$979.0B
Dividend Yield8.59%1.09%
Holdings200509
YTD Return+15.16%+13.11%
1Y Return+11.70%+22.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.16%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+3.34%+13.26%
Volatility (annualized)33.2%14.1%
Max Drawdown-94.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 28, 2002Sep 7, 2010

RQI vs VOO Performance

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc (RQI) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RQI returned +11.70% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, RQI is up 15.16% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.

Over three years, RQI compounded at +11.16% per year against +21.08% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.34% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for RQI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RQI charges 1.91% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $191 vs $3 annually, a gap of $188 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RQI currently yields 8.59% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

1.9%overlap

RQI and VOO share 22 holdings out of 654 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RQIWeight in VOODifference
WELL17.16%0.25%16.91%
DLR10.71%0.09%10.62%
AMT8.41%0.12%8.29%
CCIProProPro
PLDProProPro
EQIXProProPro
EXRProProPro
KIMProProPro
IRMProProPro
SPGProProPro
See all 10 holdings RQI shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RQI or VOO?

RQI has an expense ratio of 1.91% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $188 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RQI or VOO?

Over the past year RQI returned +11.70% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RQI annualized +1.10% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RQI or VOO?

RQI has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RQI -94.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both RQI and VOO?

RQI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RQI and VOO?

RQI and VOO share 22 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 654 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RQI or VOO?

RQI yields 8.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →