QQMG vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: QQMGMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQMGVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.03%
AUM$192M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.35%1.07%
Holdings943,543
YTD Return+19.50%+14.20%
1Y Return+29.76%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.91%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)21.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-35.4%-56.6%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 27, 2021May 24, 2001

QQMG vs VTI Performance

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQMG returned +29.76% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, QQMG is up 19.50% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, QQMG compounded at +26.91% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQMG has the edge at +16.22% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for QQMG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQMG charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQMG currently yields 0.35% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

45.3%overlap

QQMG and VTI share 77 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 45.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQMGWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA9.27%6.32%2.95%
AAPL7.29%5.84%1.45%
MSFT5.01%3.81%1.20%
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
TSLAProProPro
AMATProProPro
See all 10 holdings QQMG shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQMG or VTI?

QQMG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QQMG or VTI?

Over the past year QQMG returned +29.76% vs +24.16% for VTI, so QQMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQMG annualized +16.22% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QQMG or VTI?

QQMG has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQMG -35.4% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both QQMG and VTI?

QQMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between QQMG and VTI?

QQMG and VTI share 77 common holdings with a 45.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQMG or VTI?

QQMG yields 0.35% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →