QQMG vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: QQMGMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQMGVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.03%
AUM$192M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.35%1.09%
Holdings94509
YTD Return+19.50%+13.80%
1Y Return+29.76%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.91%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)21.5%14.1%
Max Drawdown-35.4%-34.3%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 27, 2021Sep 7, 2010

QQMG vs VOO Performance

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQMG returned +29.76% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, QQMG is up 19.50% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, QQMG compounded at +26.91% per year against +21.50% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQMG has the edge at +16.22% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for QQMG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQMG charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQMG currently yields 0.35% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

51.3%overlap

QQMG and VOO share 77 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 51.3% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQMGWeight in VOODifference
NVDA9.27%7.51%1.76%
AAPL7.29%6.59%0.70%
MSFT5.01%4.30%0.71%
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
TSLAProProPro
AMATProProPro
See all 10 holdings QQMG shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQMG or VOO?

QQMG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QQMG or VOO?

Over the past year QQMG returned +29.76% vs +23.71% for VOO, so QQMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQMG annualized +16.22% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QQMG or VOO?

QQMG has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQMG -35.4% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both QQMG and VOO?

QQMG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between QQMG and VOO?

QQMG and VOO share 77 common holdings with a 51.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQMG or VOO?

QQMG yields 0.35% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →