IVV vs QQMG

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: QQMGMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVQQMGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.20%
AUM$865.2B$192M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.35%
Holdings50894
YTD Return+13.80%+19.50%
1Y Return+23.70%+29.76%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+26.91%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%21.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-35.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 27, 2021

IVV vs QQMG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while QQMG returned +29.76%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 19.50% for QQMG.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +26.91% for QQMG. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQMG has the edge at +16.22% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.4% for QQMG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQMG charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.35% for QQMG.

Holdings Overlap

50.1%overlap

IVV and QQMG share 76 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.1% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in QQMGDifference
NVDA7.76%9.27%1.51%
AAPL7.44%7.29%0.15%
MSFT4.57%5.01%0.44%
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
TSLAProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with QQMG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or QQMG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQMG charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or QQMG?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +29.76% for QQMG, so QQMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +16.22% for QQMG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or QQMG?

QQMG has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQMG -35.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and QQMG?

IVV and QQMG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQMG?

IVV and QQMG share 76 common holdings with a 50.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQMG?

IVV yields 1.09% while QQMG yields 0.35%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →