PRVT vs VTI
PRVT vs VTI
Tema Listed Private Managers ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRVT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $424,747.12 | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.33% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.33% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.27% | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
PRVT vs VTI Performance
Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) is a ETF from Tema Global Limited and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRVT returned +15.33% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, PRVT is up 15.33% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Over three years, PRVT compounded at +5.27% per year against +20.88% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for PRVT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRVT charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRVT currently yields 0.95% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PRVT and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRVT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APO | 5.65% | 0.07% | 5.58% |
| BX | 5.59% | 0.12% | 5.47% |
| KKR | 5.48% | 0.08% | 5.40% |
| ARES | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TPG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| HLNE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| STEP | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BLK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CNS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings PRVT shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRVT or VTI?
PRVT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRVT or VTI?
Over the past year PRVT returned +15.33% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PRVT annualized +5.12% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
What is the holdings overlap between PRVT and VTI?
PRVT and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRVT or VTI?
PRVT yields 0.95% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.