IVV vs PRVT
IVV vs PRVT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tema Listed Private Managers ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PRVT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $424,747.12 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.95% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 30 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +14.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +14.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +5.31% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -20.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tema Global Limited | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 1, 2025 |
IVV vs PRVT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) is a ETF from Tema Global Limited. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while PRVT returned +14.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 14.34% for PRVT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +5.31% for PRVT. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -20.4% for PRVT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRVT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.95% for PRVT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PRVT share 5 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PRVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APO | 0.08% | 5.65% | 5.57% |
| BX | 0.14% | 5.59% | 5.45% |
| KKR | 0.10% | 5.48% | 5.38% |
| ARES | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BLK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 5 holdings IVV shares with PRVT Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PRVT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRVT charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PRVT?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +14.34% for PRVT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +4.82% for PRVT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRVT?
IVV and PRVT share 5 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRVT?
IVV yields 1.09% while PRVT yields 0.95%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.