PRVT vs VYM
PRVT vs VYM
Tema Listed Private Managers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRVT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $424,747.12 | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.93% | +15.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.93% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.14% | +17.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PRVT vs VYM Performance
Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) is a ETF from Tema Global Limited and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRVT returned +14.93% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, PRVT is up 14.93% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.
Over three years, PRVT compounded at +5.14% per year against +17.96% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for PRVT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRVT charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRVT currently yields 0.95% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PRVT and VYM share 9 holdings out of 576 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRVT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BX | 5.59% | 0.37% | 5.22% |
| APO | 5.65% | 0.19% | 5.46% |
| ARES | 5.29% | 0.09% | 5.20% |
| TPG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| STEP | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| OWL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BLK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CNS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 9 holdings PRVT shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRVT or VYM?
PRVT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRVT or VYM?
Over the past year PRVT returned +14.93% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PRVT annualized +5.00% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
What is the holdings overlap between PRVT and VYM?
PRVT and VYM share 9 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 576 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRVT or VYM?
PRVT yields 0.95% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.