OACP vs VTI
OACP vs VTI
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OACP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $268M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 255 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -0.70% | +10.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.76% | +19.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.37% | +18.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
OACP vs VTI Performance
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OACP returned +2.76% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, OACP is down 0.70% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.
Over three years, OACP compounded at +4.37% per year against +18.94% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs +1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 6.5% for OACP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for OACP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OACP charges 0.67% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $3 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OACP currently yields 4.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OACP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2912 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OACP or VTI?
OACP has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OACP or VTI?
Over the past year OACP returned +2.76% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OACP annualized +1.47% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OACP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 6.5% for OACP. Worst drawdown: OACP -11.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OACP and VTI?
OACP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OACP and VTI?
OACP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2912 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OACP or VTI?
OACP yields 4.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OACP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.