IVV vs OACP
IVV vs OACP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OACP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.67% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $268M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.69% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 255 | |
| YTD Return | +9.93% | -0.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +2.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | +4.37% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -11.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | OneAscent Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 30, 2022 |
IVV vs OACP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while OACP returned +2.76%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a loss of 0.70% for OACP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +4.37% for OACP. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs +1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.5% for OACP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -11.8% for OACP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OACP charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $67 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.69% for OACP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OACP share 0 holdings out of 634 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OACP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OACP charges 0.67%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OACP?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +2.76% for OACP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +1.47% for OACP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OACP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.5% for OACP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OACP -11.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and OACP?
IVV and OACP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OACP?
IVV and OACP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 634 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OACP?
IVV yields 1.09% while OACP yields 4.69%, so OACP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.