MBOX vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MBOX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: MBOXMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMBOXVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%
AUM$149M$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.92%1.07%
Holdings503,543
YTD Return+21.30%+14.20%
1Y Return+28.64%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.42%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.90%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)14.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-16.7%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFreedom Day DividendVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 4, 2021May 24, 2001

MBOX vs VTI Performance

Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is a ETF from Freedom Day Dividend and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MBOX returned +28.64% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, MBOX is up 21.30% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, MBOX compounded at +18.42% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.90% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, MBOX has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.3% for MBOX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for MBOX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MBOX charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBOX currently yields 1.92% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

9.3%overlap

MBOX and VTI share 37 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MBOXWeight in VTIDifference
AVGO2.68%2.46%0.22%
JPM:US2.51%1.11%1.40%
MS2.87%0.34%2.53%
XOMProProPro
KLACProProPro
GSProProPro
QCOMProProPro
DELLProProPro
MRKProProPro
UNHProProPro
See all 10 holdings MBOX shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MBOX or VTI?

MBOX has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MBOX or VTI?

Over the past year MBOX returned +28.64% vs +24.16% for VTI, so MBOX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MBOX annualized +12.66% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MBOX or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.3% for MBOX. Worst drawdown: MBOX -16.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both MBOX and VTI?

MBOX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between MBOX and VTI?

MBOX and VTI share 37 common holdings with a 9.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MBOX or VTI?

MBOX yields 1.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MBOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →