IVV vs MBOX

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. MBOX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: MBOXMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMBOXWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.39%
AUM$865.2B$149M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.92%
Holdings50850
YTD Return+13.80%+21.30%
1Y Return+23.70%+28.64%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+18.42%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+12.90%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%14.3%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-16.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Freedom Day Dividend
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000May 4, 2021

IVV vs MBOX Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is a ETF from Freedom Day Dividend. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while MBOX returned +28.64%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 21.30% for MBOX.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +18.42% for MBOX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +12.90% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, MBOX has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.3% for MBOX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.7% for MBOX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MBOX charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.92% for MBOX.

Holdings Overlap

10.3%overlap

IVV and MBOX share 29 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MBOXDifference
AVGO2.83%2.68%0.15%
JPM:US1.43%2.51%1.08%
XOM0.97%2.33%1.36%
MSProProPro
KLACProProPro
GSProProPro
QCOMProProPro
DELLProProPro
UNHProProPro
MRKProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with MBOX
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MBOX?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MBOX charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MBOX?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +28.64% for MBOX, so MBOX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +12.66% for MBOX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or MBOX?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.3% for MBOX. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MBOX -16.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and MBOX?

IVV and MBOX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MBOX?

IVV and MBOX share 29 common holdings with a 10.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MBOX?

IVV yields 1.09% while MBOX yields 1.92%, so MBOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →