KNRG vs VTI
KNRG vs VTI
Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KNRG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $151M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.15% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.06% | +23.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
KNRG vs VTI Performance
Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KNRG returned +7.06% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, KNRG is up 3.15% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.4% for KNRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.7% for KNRG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KNRG charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KNRG currently yields 6.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KNRG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2816 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KNRG or VTI?
KNRG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KNRG or VTI?
Over the past year KNRG returned +7.06% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KNRG annualized +8.99% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KNRG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.4% for KNRG. Worst drawdown: KNRG -2.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KNRG and VTI?
KNRG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KNRG and VTI?
KNRG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2816 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KNRG or VTI?
KNRG yields 6.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.