IVV vs KNRG
IVV vs KNRG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KNRG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.76% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $151M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.92% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 43 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +3.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +7.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 3.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -2.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 27, 2025 |
IVV vs KNRG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while KNRG returned +7.26%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 3.13% for KNRG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.4% for KNRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -2.7% for KNRG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KNRG charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $76 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.92% for KNRG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KNRG share 0 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KNRG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KNRG charges 0.76%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KNRG?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +7.26% for KNRG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +8.95% for KNRG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KNRG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.4% for KNRG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KNRG -2.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and KNRG?
IVV and KNRG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KNRG?
IVV and KNRG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KNRG?
IVV yields 1.09% while KNRG yields 6.92%, so KNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.