KNRG vs QQQ
KNRG vs QQQ
Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KNRG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $151M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.13% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.26% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KNRG vs QQQ Performance
Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy and Infrastructure Credit ETF (KNRG) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KNRG returned +7.26% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, KNRG is up 3.13% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.4% for KNRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.7% for KNRG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KNRG charges 0.76% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $18 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KNRG currently yields 6.92% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
KNRG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 136 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KNRG or QQQ?
KNRG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KNRG or QQQ?
Over the past year KNRG returned +7.26% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KNRG annualized +8.95% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KNRG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.4% for KNRG. Worst drawdown: KNRG -2.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KNRG and QQQ?
KNRG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KNRG and QQQ?
KNRG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 136 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KNRG or QQQ?
KNRG yields 6.92% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so KNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.