JABS vs VTI
JABS vs VTI
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JABS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.81% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 125 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.95% | +11.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.89% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Janus Henderson Investors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
JABS vs VTI Performance
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JABS returned +3.89% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, JABS is up 1.95% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 1.3% for JABS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.0% for JABS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JABS charges 0.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JABS currently yields 3.81% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JABS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2814 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JABS or VTI?
JABS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JABS or VTI?
Over the past year JABS returned +3.89% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JABS annualized +4.21% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JABS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 1.3% for JABS. Worst drawdown: JABS -1.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JABS and VTI?
JABS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JABS and VTI?
JABS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2814 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JABS or VTI?
JABS yields 3.81% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JABS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.