JABS vs QQQ
JABS vs QQQ
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JABS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | - | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.81% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 125 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.07% | +18.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.01% | +28.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.28% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Janus Henderson Investors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JABS vs QQQ Performance
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JABS returned +4.01% while QQQ returned +28.94%. Year to date, JABS is up 2.07% versus a gain of 18.34% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 1.3% for JABS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.0% for JABS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JABS charges 0.33% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JABS currently yields 3.81% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JABS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 134 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JABS or QQQ?
JABS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JABS or QQQ?
Over the past year JABS returned +4.01% vs +28.94% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JABS annualized +4.31% vs +13.12% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JABS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 1.3% for JABS. Worst drawdown: JABS -1.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JABS and QQQ?
JABS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JABS and QQQ?
JABS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 134 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JABS or QQQ?
JABS yields 3.81% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so JABS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.