IVV vs JABS
IVV vs JABS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JABS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.33% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.81% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 125 | |
| YTD Return | +9.93% | +2.06% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +4.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Janus Henderson Investors | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 22, 2025 |
IVV vs JABS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while JABS returned +4.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a gain of 2.06% for JABS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.3% for JABS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.0% for JABS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JABS charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $33 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.81% for JABS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JABS share 0 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JABS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JABS charges 0.33%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JABS?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +4.48% for JABS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +4.35% for JABS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JABS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.3% for JABS. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JABS -1.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and JABS?
IVV and JABS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JABS?
IVV and JABS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JABS?
IVV yields 1.09% while JABS yields 3.81%, so JABS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.