IMCV vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. IMCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: IMCVMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIMCVVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%
AUM$1.1B$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.89%1.07%
Holdings2753,543
YTD Return+16.11%+10.14%
1Y Return+26.42%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.78%+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.97%+11.79%
Volatility (annualized)17.7%15.4%
Max Drawdown-66.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004May 24, 2001

IMCV vs VTI Performance

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMCV returned +26.42% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, IMCV is up 16.11% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.

Over three years, IMCV compounded at +15.78% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.97% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs +7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IMCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.5% for IMCV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IMCV charges 0.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMCV currently yields 1.89% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

12.5%overlap

IMCV and VTI share 250 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IMCVWeight in VTIDifference
PNC1.46%0.14%1.32%
USB1.40%0.13%1.27%
ADP1.38%0.12%1.26%
ELVProProPro
MMMProProPro
UPSProProPro
VLOProProPro
MDLZProProPro
CIProProPro
TRVProProPro
See all 10 holdings IMCV shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IMCV or VTI?

IMCV has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IMCV or VTI?

Over the past year IMCV returned +26.42% vs +19.82% for VTI, so IMCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IMCV annualized +7.95% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IMCV or VTI?

IMCV has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IMCV -66.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both IMCV and VTI?

IMCV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IMCV and VTI?

IMCV and VTI share 250 common holdings with a 12.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IMCV or VTI?

IMCV yields 1.89% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IMCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →