IMCV vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. IMCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: IMCVMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIMCVVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%
AUM$1.1B$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.89%1.09%
Holdings275509
YTD Return+17.73%+13.53%
1Y Return+27.98%+23.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.62%+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.36%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)17.7%14.1%
Max Drawdown-66.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004Sep 7, 2010

IMCV vs VOO Performance

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMCV returned +27.98% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, IMCV is up 17.73% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.

Over three years, IMCV compounded at +16.62% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.36% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IMCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.5% for IMCV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IMCV charges 0.06% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMCV currently yields 1.89% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

13.2%overlap

IMCV and VOO share 225 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IMCVWeight in VOODifference
PNC1.46%0.15%1.31%
USB1.40%0.15%1.25%
ADP1.38%0.14%1.24%
ELVProProPro
MMMProProPro
UPSProProPro
VLOProProPro
MDLZProProPro
CIProProPro
TRVProProPro
See all 10 holdings IMCV shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IMCV or VOO?

IMCV has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IMCV or VOO?

Over the past year IMCV returned +27.98% vs +23.65% for VOO, so IMCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IMCV annualized +8.01% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IMCV or VOO?

IMCV has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IMCV -66.5% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IMCV and VOO?

IMCV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IMCV and VOO?

IMCV and VOO share 225 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IMCV or VOO?

IMCV yields 1.89% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IMCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →