ILCG vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricILCGVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.03%
AUM$3.1B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.41%1.07%
Holdings3313,543
YTD Return+7.44%+10.14%
1Y Return+11.83%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.21%+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.50%+11.79%
Volatility (annualized)16.9%15.4%
Max Drawdown-53.2%-56.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004May 24, 2001

ILCG vs VTI Performance

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ILCG returned +11.83% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, ILCG is up 7.44% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.

Over three years, ILCG compounded at +21.21% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.50% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, ILCG has the edge at +10.82% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ILCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for ILCG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ILCG charges 0.04% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILCG currently yields 0.41% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

60.8%overlap

ILCG and VTI share 295 holdings out of 2814 unique holdings combined, representing a 60.8% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ILCGWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA14.11%6.32%7.79%
AAPL7.06%5.84%1.22%
AVGO5.36%2.46%2.90%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
MSFTProProPro
GOOGProProPro
LLYProProPro
AMDProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ILCG shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ILCG or VTI?

ILCG has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ILCG or VTI?

Over the past year ILCG returned +11.83% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), ILCG annualized +10.82% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ILCG or VTI?

ILCG has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ILCG -53.2% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both ILCG and VTI?

ILCG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ILCG and VTI?

ILCG and VTI share 295 common holdings with a 60.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2814 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ILCG or VTI?

ILCG yields 0.41% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →