ILCG vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricILCGVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.03%
AUM$3.1B$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.41%1.09%
Holdings331509
YTD Return+7.44%+9.95%
1Y Return+11.83%+19.58%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.21%+19.43%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.50%+12.89%
Volatility (annualized)16.9%14.2%
Max Drawdown-53.2%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004Sep 7, 2010

ILCG vs VOO Performance

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ILCG returned +11.83% while VOO returned +19.58%. Year to date, ILCG is up 7.44% versus a gain of 9.95% for VOO.

Over three years, ILCG compounded at +21.21% per year against +19.43% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.50% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ILCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for ILCG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ILCG charges 0.04% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILCG currently yields 0.41% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

65.7%overlap

ILCG and VOO share 247 holdings out of 584 unique holdings combined, representing a 65.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ILCGWeight in VOODifference
NVDA14.11%7.51%6.60%
AAPL7.06%6.59%0.47%
AVGO5.36%2.77%2.59%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
MSFTProProPro
GOOGProProPro
LLYProProPro
AMDProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ILCG shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ILCG or VOO?

ILCG has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ILCG or VOO?

Over the past year ILCG returned +11.83% vs +19.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ILCG annualized +10.82% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ILCG or VOO?

ILCG has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ILCG -53.2% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both ILCG and VOO?

ILCG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ILCG and VOO?

ILCG and VOO share 247 common holdings with a 65.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 584 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ILCG or VOO?

ILCG yields 0.41% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →