IGLB vs VTI
IGLB vs VTI
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGLB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.6B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 3,825 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.76% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.45% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.96% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.88% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
IGLB vs VTI Performance
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGLB returned +0.45% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, IGLB is down 1.76% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, IGLB compounded at +3.96% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.88% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.5% for IGLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for IGLB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGLB charges 0.04% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGLB currently yields 5.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IGLB and VTI share 1 holdings out of 4175 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGLB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADM | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGLB or VTI?
IGLB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGLB or VTI?
Over the past year IGLB returned +0.45% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IGLB annualized +1.17% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGLB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.5% for IGLB. Worst drawdown: IGLB -34.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IGLB and VTI?
IGLB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGLB and VTI?
IGLB and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4175 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGLB or VTI?
IGLB yields 5.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IGLB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.