IGLB vs IVV
IGLB vs IVV
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGLB offers more diversification with 1393 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGLB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.6B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.23% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 3,825 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -1.76% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.45% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.96% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.88% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2009 | May 15, 2000 |
IGLB vs IVV Performance
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGLB returned +0.45% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, IGLB is down 1.76% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, IGLB compounded at +3.96% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.88% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.5% for IGLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for IGLB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGLB charges 0.04% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGLB currently yields 5.23% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGLB or IVV?
IGLB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGLB or IVV?
Over the past year IGLB returned +0.45% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IGLB annualized +1.17% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGLB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.5% for IGLB. Worst drawdown: IGLB -34.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGLB and IVV?
IGLB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGLB and IVV?
IGLB and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1896 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGLB or IVV?
IGLB yields 5.23% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IGLB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.