GRNB vs VTI
GRNB vs VTI
VanEck Green Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRNB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $185M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 472 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.03% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.02% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.02% | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.42% | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
GRNB vs VTI Performance
VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRNB returned +2.02% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, GRNB is up 0.03% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Over three years, GRNB compounded at +5.02% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.42% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.2% for GRNB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for GRNB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRNB charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNB currently yields 4.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GRNB and VTI share 1 holdings out of 3130 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GRNB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SO | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRNB or VTI?
GRNB has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRNB or VTI?
Over the past year GRNB returned +2.02% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), GRNB annualized +1.45% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRNB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.2% for GRNB. Worst drawdown: GRNB -18.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GRNB and VTI?
GRNB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRNB and VTI?
GRNB and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3130 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRNB or VTI?
GRNB yields 4.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GRNB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.