GRNB vs QQQ
GRNB vs QQQ
VanEck Green Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GRNB offers more diversification with 348 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRNB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $185M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 472 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.01% | +16.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.04% | +26.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.00% | +24.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.51% | +14.88% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GRNB vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GRNB returned +2.04% while QQQ returned +26.58%. Year to date, GRNB is up 0.01% versus a gain of 16.83% for QQQ.
Over three years, GRNB compounded at +5.00% per year against +24.70% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.51% and +14.88% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.2% for GRNB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for GRNB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRNB charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNB currently yields 4.23% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GRNB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 451 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRNB or QQQ?
GRNB has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRNB or QQQ?
Over the past year GRNB returned +2.04% vs +26.58% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), GRNB annualized +1.45% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRNB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.2% for GRNB. Worst drawdown: GRNB -18.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GRNB and QQQ?
GRNB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRNB and QQQ?
GRNB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 451 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRNB or QQQ?
GRNB yields 4.23% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so GRNB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.