CLSE vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. CLSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: CLSEMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCLSEVTIWinner
Expense Ratio1.52%0.03%
AUM$803M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.76%1.07%
Holdings3573,543
YTD Return+23.71%+13.57%
1Y Return+43.30%+24.23%
3Y Return (annualized)+29.88%+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.24%
Volatility (annualized)12.4%15.3%
Max Drawdown-16.4%-56.6%
Fund FamilyConvergence Investment PartnersVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 29, 2009May 24, 2001

CLSE vs VTI Performance

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is a ETF from Convergence Investment Partners and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLSE returned +43.30% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, CLSE is up 23.71% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.

Over three years, CLSE compounded at +29.88% per year against +20.73% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, CLSE has the edge at +20.85% annualized vs +8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.4% for CLSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for CLSE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CLSE charges 1.52% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $152 vs $3 annually, a gap of $149 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSE currently yields 0.76% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

32.0%overlap

CLSE and VTI share 302 holdings out of 2850 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CLSEWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA4.91%6.32%1.41%
AAPL0.33%5.84%5.51%
AMZN2.44%3.17%0.73%
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
MUProProPro
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
PRProProPro
See all 10 holdings CLSE shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CLSE or VTI?

CLSE has an expense ratio of 1.52% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $149 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CLSE or VTI?

Over the past year CLSE returned +43.30% vs +24.23% for VTI, so CLSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CLSE annualized +20.85% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CLSE or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.4% for CLSE. Worst drawdown: CLSE -16.4% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both CLSE and VTI?

CLSE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CLSE and VTI?

CLSE and VTI share 302 common holdings with a 32.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2850 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CLSE or VTI?

CLSE yields 0.76% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →