CLSE vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. CLSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: CLSEMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCLSEVYMWinner
Expense Ratio1.52%0.04%
AUM$803M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.76%2.86%
Holdings357568
YTD Return+22.44%+15.20%
1Y Return+40.43%+25.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+29.41%+17.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)12.4%14.6%
Max Drawdown-16.4%-58.8%
Fund FamilyConvergence Investment PartnersVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 29, 2009Nov 10, 2006

CLSE vs VYM Performance

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is a ETF from Convergence Investment Partners and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLSE returned +40.43% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, CLSE is up 22.44% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.

Over three years, CLSE compounded at +29.41% per year against +17.86% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, CLSE has the edge at +20.56% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.4% for CLSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for CLSE and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CLSE charges 1.52% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $152 vs $4 annually, a gap of $148 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSE currently yields 0.76% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

18.6%overlap

CLSE and VYM share 111 holdings out of 816 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CLSEWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO1.42%6.47%5.05%
JNJ0.76%2.62%1.86%
WMT0.91%2.44%1.53%
XOMProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
CSCOProProPro
BACProProPro
ADIProProPro
MRKProProPro
DELLProProPro
See all 10 holdings CLSE shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CLSE or VYM?

CLSE has an expense ratio of 1.52% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $148 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CLSE or VYM?

Over the past year CLSE returned +40.43% vs +25.56% for VYM, so CLSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CLSE annualized +20.56% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CLSE or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.4% for CLSE. Worst drawdown: CLSE -16.4% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both CLSE and VYM?

CLSE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CLSE and VYM?

CLSE and VYM share 111 common holdings with a 18.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 816 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CLSE or VYM?

CLSE yields 0.76% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →