BGB vs VTI
BGB vs VTI
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $524M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.21% | +10.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.41% | +19.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.41% | +18.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.45% | +11.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | The Blackstone Group Inc | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
BGB vs VTI Performance
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund (BGB) is a ETF from The Blackstone Group Inc and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGB returned -2.41% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, BGB is down 1.21% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BGB compounded at +9.41% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.45% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs -0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 11.8% for BGB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.1% for BGB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
BGB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3142 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, BGB or VTI?
Over the past year BGB returned -2.41% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), BGB annualized -0.91% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 11.8% for BGB. Worst drawdown: BGB -59.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BGB and VTI?
BGB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGB and VTI?
BGB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3142 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGB or VTI?
BGB yields 8.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BGB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.