BGB vs QQQ
BGB vs QQQ
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BGB offers more diversification with 359 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $524M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.14% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.41% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.70% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.57% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.26% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | The Blackstone Group Inc | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BGB vs QQQ Performance
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund (BGB) is a ETF from The Blackstone Group Inc and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BGB returned -1.70% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, BGB is down 0.41% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, BGB compounded at +9.57% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.26% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.8% for BGB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.1% for BGB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
BGB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 462 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, BGB or QQQ?
Over the past year BGB returned -1.70% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), BGB annualized -0.85% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.8% for BGB. Worst drawdown: BGB -59.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BGB and QQQ?
BGB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGB and QQQ?
BGB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 462 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGB or QQQ?
BGB yields 8.14% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BGB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.