ADME vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMEVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%
AUM$289M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.35%1.07%
Holdings1543,543
YTD Return+11.14%+13.57%
1Y Return+17.55%+24.23%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.20%+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.51%+12.24%
Volatility (annualized)13.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-28.7%-56.6%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 8, 2016May 24, 2001

ADME vs VTI Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is a ETF from Aptus ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ADME returned +17.55% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, ADME is up 11.14% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.

Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.20% per year against +20.73% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.51% and +12.24% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ADME has the edge at +8.66% annualized vs +8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.5% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for ADME and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.35% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

65.7%overlap

ADME and VTI share 157 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 65.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA7.49%6.32%1.17%
AAPL7.76%5.84%1.92%
MSFT4.54%3.81%0.73%
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
JPMProProPro
See all 10 holdings ADME shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or VTI?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ADME or VTI?

Over the past year ADME returned +17.55% vs +24.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ADME annualized +8.66% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ADME or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.5% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -28.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both ADME and VTI?

ADME and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and VTI?

ADME and VTI share 157 common holdings with a 65.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or VTI?

ADME yields 0.35% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →