ADME vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMEIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%
AUM$289M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.35%1.09%
Holdings154508
YTD Return+11.14%+13.31%
1Y Return+17.55%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.20%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.51%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)13.5%15.1%
Max Drawdown-28.7%-56.5%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 8, 2016May 15, 2000

ADME vs IVV Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is a ETF from Aptus ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ADME returned +17.55% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, ADME is up 11.14% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.20% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.51% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ADME has the edge at +8.66% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.5% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for ADME and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.35% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

73.7%overlap

ADME and IVV share 157 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 73.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA7.49%7.76%0.27%
AAPL7.76%7.44%0.32%
MSFT4.54%4.57%0.03%
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
JPMProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ADME shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or IVV?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ADME or IVV?

Over the past year ADME returned +17.55% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ADME annualized +8.66% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ADME or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.5% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -28.7% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both ADME and IVV?

ADME and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and IVV?

ADME and IVV share 157 common holdings with a 73.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or IVV?

ADME yields 0.35% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →