VNLA vs VXUS
VNLA vs VXUS
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VNLA | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3.2B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.25% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 380 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.13% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.32% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.63% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.93% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Janus Henderson Investors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
VNLA vs VXUS Performance
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VNLA returned +4.32% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, VNLA is up 2.13% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, VNLA compounded at +5.63% per year against +18.63% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.93% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs +2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.5% for VNLA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.7% for VNLA and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VNLA charges 0.23% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $5 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VNLA currently yields 5.25% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
VNLA and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8055 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VNLA or VXUS?
VNLA has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VNLA or VXUS?
Over the past year VNLA returned +4.32% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), VNLA annualized +2.09% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VNLA or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.5% for VNLA. Worst drawdown: VNLA -4.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both VNLA and VXUS?
VNLA and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VNLA and VXUS?
VNLA and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8055 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VNLA or VXUS?
VNLA yields 5.25% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VNLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.