VNLA vs VOO
VNLA vs VOO
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VNLA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.2B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.25% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 380 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.06% | +9.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.45% | +19.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.65% | +19.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.91% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Janus Henderson Investors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
VNLA vs VOO Performance
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VNLA returned +4.45% while VOO returned +19.58%. Year to date, VNLA is up 2.06% versus a gain of 9.95% for VOO.
Over three years, VNLA compounded at +5.65% per year against +19.43% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.91% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 1.5% for VNLA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.7% for VNLA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VNLA charges 0.23% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VNLA currently yields 5.25% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
VNLA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 700 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VNLA or VOO?
VNLA has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VNLA or VOO?
Over the past year VNLA returned +4.45% vs +19.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), VNLA annualized +2.09% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VNLA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 1.5% for VNLA. Worst drawdown: VNLA -4.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both VNLA and VOO?
VNLA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VNLA and VOO?
VNLA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 700 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VNLA or VOO?
VNLA yields 5.25% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VNLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.